home

From Shared Living to a Life-Service System: Young Residents’ Everyday Practices and Service Touchpoints in Seoul Co-living Spaces

Authors

  • Jihyun Sung

    Author

Keywords:

Co-living, Shared Housing, Service Touchpoints, Young Residents

Abstract

Co-living has become an important residential model in Seoul, South Korea, where young single-person households face high housing costs, compact living conditions, and changing expectations of urban life. Existing studies have often examined co-living through spatial typologies, such as private units, community spaces, leisure spaces, and workspaces. However, contemporary co-living increasingly operates as a life-service system in which spatial design, digital platforms, maintenance services, community programs, and management rules jointly shape everyday living. This article examines Seoul co-living as an integrated service ecosystem rather than a purely architectural or real-estate model. Based on a document-based review of academic literature, policy materials, market reports, and publicly available operator descriptions, the study develops a service-touchpoint framework for analyzing how co-living organizes daily routines. The analysis argues that the value of co-living lies not only in shared facilities but also in the coordination of entry, booking, cooking, working, cleaning, maintenance, social participation, and withdrawal from interaction. The article contributes to housing and design research by reframing co-living as a spatial-service assemblage that mediates privacy, convenience, and selective community participation.

References

Byun, N., & Shon, D. W. (2022). Living place matters: The duplicity of shared housing in the young adults of South Korea. Front. Psychol. 13:634905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.634905

Kim, K. E., Han, K. H., & Hwang, Y. S. (2022). Spatial characteristics of common spaces of co-living houses for young single-person households. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 31(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2022.31.2.114

Lang, R., Carriou, C., & Czischke, D. (2020). Collaborative Housing Research (1990–2017): A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 10–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1536077

Lee, H. Y. (2016). A case study on spatial characteristics in collective house for the activation of the community. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 25(1), 3–12.

Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT Press.

Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M. E., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J. (2018). This is service design doing: Applying service design thinking in the real world. O’Reilly Media.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3

Williams, J. (2005). Designing neighbourhoods for social interaction: The case of cohousing. Journal of Urban Design, 10(2), 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500086998

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

From Shared Living to a Life-Service System: Young Residents’ Everyday Practices and Service Touchpoints in Seoul Co-living Spaces. (2026). Art & Design for Humanity, 2(05). https://adh-journal.com/index.php/journal001/article/view/57